OK, so they scan their images in order to be printed. Or would a majority scan their negatives (kind of RAW) in order to be editied in PhotoShop, and then printed later on?
Then, it's not film that is dead, but it's the film printing industry that is. Syb 2007/8/5, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "syb vis" > Subject: Re: FID (Film is Dead) > > > >I wonder what those new film-photographers do with their film... I bet > > there's a big bunch to ask the lab to put it under a > > HI-RES-filmscanner after developing. > > > > Anyone here in the position to confirm/deny? > > There are no optical printers still being made, AFAIK. Any new equipment > being installed is scanning film. > > > > > Btw: how much MP can be made of a 6x7 (yes, i have an old RB) film > > negative? > > > > Lots. 30 or more. > > William Robb > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- ======================== Syb Vis, The Netherlands. "Since i bought my DSLR, i do no longer buy prints. Instead, i pay digital frames. Who said it would become cheaper?" ================================= -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
