Having read the other responses to this post, I begin to wonder just how other people have calibrated their monitors. It looks fine to me, a bit more digital noise than I'd like, but still not bad, (I'd probably have added a layer of artificial grain to make the noise look more film like), but contrast and brightness looks fine, for a low res image, on my monitor.
frank theriault wrote: > Toronto jazz musician/bike messenger Tim Hamel, at a recent concert: > > http://tinyurl.com/2vucm5 > > http://bp1.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RrX65rMIt5I/AAAAAAAAAhY/K240-dQRBFY/s1600-h/tim_hamel.jpg > > I hope this looks okay - I find doing this stuff on a laptop (my only > computer with PS on it - my work computer being the only other > computer I have access to). > > Shot @ ISO 3200, cropped a bit, minor adjustments. I actually like > the grain (I know that it's "noise" in digitese) - gives it a vintage > look, IMHO. > > Hopefully you like. All comments (good or bad) gratefully accepted. > > thanks! > -frank > > -- The difference between Microsoft and 'Jurassic Park': In one, a mad businessman makes a lot of money with beasts that should be extinct. The other is a film. -- Unattributed -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
