HI Scott. I have the 6x7 with mirror lock up, so i quess thats the more recent one of that set.
Its heavy, but as proven by WW and Aaron Reynolds, can be handheld at slow speeds with good results. I have the 90 f2.8 leaf lens and the Tak 200 F 4( i tyhink it is.) That 200 is the best lens i own other then the 77, and both take lovely pictures, nice a crisp. I always wanted to get a wider lens but never got around to getting one. Not sure about fixing them, but i';m sure there are people out there that can still work them. Brother Dave On 8/27/07, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since I'm toying with the possibility of selling the K10, I'm also > considering where I'm going to sink the money. One of my options is a > 67 with one (count 'em, 1) lens. I got a couple questions. I recall > reading somewhere (probably this very list) that the 67 body is a better > option than a 6x7. Newer, more likely to be repairable, etc. Would > someone mind confirming that for me? Also, I'm looking at a normal lens > to go with it. SMC Takumar 105/2.4, SMC 105/2.4 or SMC 90/2.8? Any > opinions? Thanks! > > -- > Scott Loveless > http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
