> maybe this discussion has prompted more voters among the > photographers, or maybe more positive voting?
More likely it's showing the randomness of the process. If it was a truly "bad" images I would like to believe it would not have been accepted the second time around. Kenneth Waller http://tinyurl.com/272u2f ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rebekah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting > maybe this discussion has prompted more voters among the > photographers, or maybe more positive voting? who knows. Glad to > hear your photo got in though. > > rg2 > > > On 9/1/07, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I don't know what the hell is going on. >> >> One of the shots I mentioned the other day that had been declined (the >> sunset shot), I resubmitted, and it has now been accepted. >> >> ??? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dave >> >> >> On 9/1/07, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > From: >> > "Kenneth Waller" >> > > I seem to remember somewhere seeing that the judges will have the >> > > final say on accepted images. >> > > >> > > Kenneth Waller >> > Yeah, peer voters can vote it in and the judges can vote it out. >> > >> > But can the judges vote it in if the peer voters vote it out? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
