On 9/5/07, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You argue pro cat stew.
I'm not pro cat stew. When I first heard it on the news here, I thought it was one of the stupidest & disgusting things I'd heard of in a while. > So I don't take you seriously. Stew or not, that's as it should be :-) But you can be sure that what I wrote below is serious (well...as serious as I ever get) Cheers, Dave > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 6:23 PM > Subject: Re: Stupid lens survery > > > On 9/4/07, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But I'm not sure if I'd go the Pentax route again, judging from what I see > > in the horison now. I love the K10D. I love my FA* 85, I'm also sure I'll > > love the two fast DA* zooms. But where is the long lens lineup? The > > 200/2,8 > > and 300/4 will not fill the gap for me. I need something longer. A 400/ > > would be a lot better. My K-500/4,5 has way too much CA to do what I > > really > > would like to do. In practical use it is an f:8. It is a lot better than > > nothing, but far from what I'd like. And the really flexible and good > > legacy > > lenses are far too expensive at the moment. > > I know for a fact if all my kit was stolen or destroyed tomorrow, and > I had to start all over again, Pentax wouldn't be my first, or second, > choice. > > Cheers, > > Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
