On Sep 6, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > ... I get more quality for a given amount of effort from 645 than I > would > from even a K10D, even if the max available quality (K10D RAW vs. 4490 > scans of my 645 negs) is essentially the same. ...
Hmm. I find quite the opposite: - Fit camera to tripod. - Meter. Focus. Expose scene. Once home with K10D: - Put card in reader. - Tell Lightroom to import files - Pick good ones. - Adjust as required. - Print 13x19. Done Once home with P645: - Load film into processing tank. - Process. - Remove film and hang to dry. - Cut film into strips. - Pick good ones on light table. - Scan each good one. - Tell Lightroom to import files - Adjust as required. - Print 13x19 Done Seems to me there are a few more time consuming, tedious steps to do with the P645 than there are with the K10D. Presuming that I've focused and composed with equal competence, I've put more effort into the P645 for the same quality. Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
