Fun, but $$$$$ Regards, Bob S. On 9/6/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > On Sep 6, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > > > >> ... I get more quality for a given amount of effort from 645 than I > >> would > >> from even a K10D, even if the max available quality (K10D RAW vs. 4490 > >> scans of my 645 negs) is essentially the same. ... > > > > Hmm. I find quite the opposite: > > > > - Fit camera to tripod. > > - Meter. Focus. Expose scene. > > > > Once home with K10D: > > > > - Put card in reader. > > - Tell Lightroom to import files > > - Pick good ones. > > - Adjust as required. > > - Print 13x19. > > Done > > > > Once home with P645: > > > > - Load film into processing tank. > > - Process. > > - Remove film and hang to dry. > > - Cut film into strips. > > - Pick good ones on light table. > > - Scan each good one. > > - Tell Lightroom to import files > > - Adjust as required. > > - Print 13x19 > > Done > > > > Seems to me there are a few more time consuming, tedious steps to do > > with the P645 than there are with the K10D. Presuming that I've > > focused and composed with equal competence, I've put more effort into > > the P645 for the same quality. > > > > Godfrey > > > > The difference being I find developing & scanning to be > non-tedious(although somewhat time consuming, developing in particular > I enjoy, it's almost meditation for me), and working in Photoshop to be > tedious. And as I shoot a fair bit of E6 or C41 in the camera, > developing isn't always an issue. > > -Adam > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
