Glen Tortorella wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Since I have a new, more "advanced" body, the N80, I tried taking  
> some shots I would have avoided in the past.  The results were awful-- 
> not one good shot on the entire role, a miserable 0-for-24 (Kodak  
> Gold 200).
> 
> In the past, I would avoid two types of shots: 1) indoor shots and 2)  
> outdoor "high sun" shots in the fair weather months (i.e. during the  
> hours of about 10:00-4:00).  In doing so, I have assured myself  
> decent, but not necessarily perfect, results.  Since the N80 has a  
> better metering system (10-segment) and a pop-up flash that is  
> supposed to be pretty good, I figured: "let me see what it can do."   
> As I have said, the results were dreadful.  Here are the main issues.
> 
> 1) Every indoor flash shot showed at least moderate spotlight/wash- 
> out effect of the subject (people).

Dial in -0.7 stops of Flash exposure compensation when shooting people with 
Nikon flashes (including the popup). Leave this permanently dialed in. 

> 2) On the outdoor "high sun" shots, the camera turned a seemingly  
> minor shadows (through the viewfinder) on the subject's face into a  
> black blobs that covered almost all of the subject's face.

Add flash, leave the -0.7 stops of FEC dialed in.

> 3) When taking indoor shots with the flash, I would meter (10- 
> segment) something like 1/30 or 1/45 or perhaps 1/60 at, say, f2.   
> With the flash powered up, I do not think it ever metered  
> differently.  For example, 1/30 at f/2 was still 1/30 at f/2 with the  
> flash enabled.  Is this correct, or is there something wrong with my  
> camera?

That is correct, the N80 will attempt to balance the exposure if it can get the 
shutter between 1/125 and 1/30 or so, with a slight bias towards the flash 
illumination (hence the FEC I recommend). If you want a pure flash exposure, 
shoot in manual.


> 4) The one decent shot in the whole role--an indoor shot using only  
> available light...go figure?--was spoiled by some sort of small speck  
> on the subject's face.  I usually keep my filter free of dust, etc.   
> Could this speck have appeared as a result of the cheap processing I  
> used (Wal-Mart C-41)?

Probably. Check your negs.

> 
> I know that using a fill flash may have alleviated the problem  
> expressed in issue number 2, but, since I have had my subjects turn a  
> bit ghastly by using the flash, I am hesitant to use it indoors or  
> outdoors.  I would appreciate any advice or commentary (or even pep  
> talk), as I am pretty down about this.  What good is a more  
> "advanced" camera if I cannot even come remotely close to  
> satisfactory results on the more difficult shots (i.e. indoor, "high  
> sun," etc.)?
> 
> Thanks,
> Glen 
>    
> 

Fill flash is your friend, but remember direct flash always looks a bit 
ghastly. A (cheap) SB-24 and an SC-17 or SC-28 cord will get the flash 
off-camera with full TTL, and is a much better option.

-Adam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to