NO NO. You are separating points and misapplying the logic.
As I said below Peter, and with all due respect, I think I've taken
this as far as I care to.

Jack
--- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> You entirely miss the point. You cannot claim copyright on something
> you 
> hold no copyright to. If he pays it will be a miscarriage of justice
> and 
> in the end all photographers will pay and pay dearly.
> 
> Jack Davis wrote:
> > Copyright protected (against commercial image use) sights have been
> in
> > existence for quite awhile. I wouldn't be surprised if Mr Ham pays,
> > especially due to the trespass issue.
> > Without taking it any further, if it is the sight I am guessing it
> is,
> > it is one which is much used for commercial purposed.
> >
> > Jack
> > --- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> Yes, but they're suing him for copyright infringement. That's the 
> >> problem they're idiots, and if they can manage to get a court ot
> go 
> >> along with them in the interests of justice then it hurts us all.
> The
> >>
> >> case as it stands should be thrown out and the proper legal action
> 
> >> taken. That is unless he had permission to be there then they have
> no
> >>
> >> standing.
> >>
> >> Jack Davis wrote:
> >>     
> >>> In this case, the "trespass" is the problem..what else?
> >>>
> >>> Jack
> >>> --- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >>>> Sorry Jack you can't copyright a work of nature. They can go
> after
> >>>> him 
> >>>> for trespass. Don't help the idiots any more than is necessary.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jack Davis wrote:
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>>>> Mr Ham had no right to do what he did. "Private" property
> rights
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >>>> should
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>>>> always be respected especially when privacy is to be
> compromised
> >>>>>           
> >> by
> >>     
> >>>>> being held up to the world to see.
> >>>>> "Privacy" and "security" are too closely related these days.
> >>>>> That being said, I'm somewhat ambivalent about being restricted
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >>>> from
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>>>> taking pictures of something which is on private property, but
> >>>>>           
> >> from
> >>     
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >>>> a
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>>>> public property position.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jack
> >>>>> --- Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >>>>>> Just found this interesting, what do you guys think?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://www.thestate.com/local/story/190126.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> rg2
> >>>>>> -- 
> >>>>>> "the subject of a photograph is far less important than its
> >>>>>> composition"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -- 
> >>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
> >>>>>>             
> >> above
> >>     
> >>>>>> and follow the directions.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>     
> >>>>>>         
> >>>>>>             
> >>>>>        
> >>>>>
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> >   
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >>>>> Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from
> someone
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >>>> who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>>>> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> Remember, it’s pillage then burn.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
> above
> >>>> and follow the directions.
> >>>>
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>>
> >>>        
> >>>
> >>>       
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> >   
> >>> Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your
> pocket:
> >>>       
> >> mail, news, photos & more. 
> >>     
> >>> http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
> >>>
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> -- 
> >> Remember, it’s pillage then burn.
> >>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
> >> and follow the directions.
> >>
> >>     
> >
> >
> >
> >        
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone
> who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
> > http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> -- 
> Remember, it’s pillage then burn.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
> and follow the directions.
> 



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Shape Yahoo! in your own image.  Join our Network Research Panel today!   
http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to