Hi, I have personally printed, on my own Epson Stylus Photo 700, A4-sized prints from Kodachrome 64 scanned onto Kodak Photo CD which are better, in my opinion, than R-type supposedly exhibition quality prints of the same slides produced by one of the leading professional labs in London. My prints, using consumer-grade equipment (but professional grade inks and paper) were cheaper, easier to make (for me) and better quality. It's exactly this that has convinced me to give up entirely on chemical output, to get a film scanner, upgrade my PC and buy 2 A3 printers.
I've seen a lot of photographs and I know what exhibition-quality means. Perhaps you've just been unlucky not to have seen a good digital print from consumer grade equipment, but they do exist. --- Bob mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, November 12, 2001, 10:21:18 AM, you wrote: > Sure, sure, I agree. Digital prints from drum scanned 10,000 dpi images > printed on a $10- 20,000 printer are fantastic. I say again I have never > seen a digital print made on a consumer grade printer that is as good as a > good photographic print of the same size. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
