Yes, yes, I see the Airlines really care about my well being and want to give me phone service... (What do you mean the limit on my credit card is too low).
David Savage wrote: > What? Terrorists? > > Airliners are concerned about the possibility of radio/navigation > equipment interference, hence the shielding reference. > > That's why every seat on most modern aircraft have built in payphones. > > Cheers, > > Dave > > On 10/14/07, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If it were not for cel-phones that last 9-11 airliner would have hit >> something >> too. It seems sad that the price all those folks paid to save others is now >> rewarded by an absolute ban on using them??? >> >> I would like to make the point that it has been proven over and over that >> airlines would not know a terrorist or hijacker if they walked onto one of >> their >> airplanes. It would be worth putting up with all the BS if it did some good, >> but >> it is only a show put on by people who are basically incompetent. What we are >> dealing with as in almost all these kinds of cases is an authority problem, >> sometimes referred to as a God Complex. >> >> >> >> Cotty wrote: >> >>> <http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2201081/man-arrested-iphone> >>> > > -- Remember, it’s pillage then burn. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
