Tom C wrote: >Most of you guys are missing my point, or maybe I'm not >acknowledging that I get yours. > >I'm just trying to say that high ISO quality seems to viewed as a >holy grail in digital photography, and my perception, right, wrong,
I think you're exactly right, Tom. Sure there are a few who really need high ISO performance: sports pros often shoot football games with a 600/4 and 2x teleconverter under stadium lighting at night. Closed down 1 f-stop to recover some sharpness, they're at f/11 and shooting fast action. But high ISO performance has become the holy grail for a lot of people who don't really need it. Of course, if it sells cameras then the camera makers have to go for it... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
