I agree.  I've got to get myself a decent tripod before I
try again - my attempts show too much camera shake.

On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 11:21:49AM -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Well, it is a better moon than I have ever done and I have even
> cheaper glass than you do for that kind of thing.  Nice shot.
> 
> -- 
> Bruce
> 
> 
> Friday, October 26, 2007, 7:38:54 AM, you wrote:
> 
> pcn> The Halloween precursor full moon crept in  last night, and
> pcn> I celebrated with a wee bit of scotch. So I had to try to see if
> pcn> I could get a decent pic with my bargain big glass: the A400/5.6
> pcn> plus the A2X-S converter. There was some water vapor in the air,
> pcn> so I think I can top this on a perfect night. But this shot is
> pcn> better than the moon I sold through the stock house a couple
> pcn> years ago.  Not as good, of course, as the one Ken shot with his
> pcn> gimble mount and FA 600/4. But it comes at less than a tenth of
> pcn> the price. By the way, after shooting, I did a bit of barking and
> pcn> danced naked in the backyard. The neighbors appreciated that.
> pcn> Anyway, here's the moon:
> pcn> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6569744&size=lg
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to