--- Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's the old-fashioned way, much less efficient > that an automated transfer, and you lose shooting > time doing it. > > -Adam >
Gee, I'm not so sure. How fast is WiFi transfer? Faster than a cable? I transfer very low res images from my cell phone to my Mac via Bluetooth and it takes longer than you'd think. Also, transferring from a card or directly from the camera into my machine requires no menu navigation or anything. I plug in the camera and turn it on and point the images to a folder in Aperture. Is this the same with WiFi? Is the process more complicated? It is with my cell... I see the advantage for wireless only where distance and convenience getting to a computer is an issue, as in William's example, not the speed of the transfer itself which I believe is negligable compared to wired transfer (if I'm wrong someone correct me). -Brendan > > Brendan MacRae wrote: > > Ok, so I pop in another card and hand the full one > to > > my assistant selling dye-sub prints to guests. > > > > Then go shoot some more. > > > > -Brendan > > --- Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> And if you've got an assistant at the dye-sub > >> printer selling 8x10's for $25/ea to the guests? > >> > >> -Adam > >> > >> Brendan MacRae wrote: > >>> Why would I do that? I would just pop in another > >> card. > >>> -Brendan > >>> --- Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Try doing that across a dance floor. > >>>> > >>>> -Adam > >>>> > >>>> Brendan MacRae wrote: > >>>>> I just don't get it. What's so tough about > >> hooking > >>>> a > >>>>> camera to the computer via a cable? > >>>>> > >>>>> -Brendan > >>>>> --- Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> There's now a 2GB SD card that also does WiFi > >>>>>> transfers. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008022.html > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So your lowly K110D can now have a capability > >>>> once > >>>>>> reserved for pro and semi-pro bodies, for far > >>>> less > >>>>>> than the high 3-digit price of the Wifi > >>>> transmitters > >>>>>> for those bodies. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -Adam > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit > the > >>>> link > >>>>>> directly above and follow the directions. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > __________________________________________________ > >>>>> Do You Yahoo!? > >>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > >>>> protection around > >>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the > >> link > >>>> directly above and follow the directions. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > __________________________________________________ > >>> Do You Yahoo!? > >>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > >> protection around > >>> http://mail.yahoo.com > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the > link > >> directly above and follow the directions. > >> > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
