On Oct 31, 2007, at 6:23 PM, William Robb wrote: >>> I actually have some misgivings about that. I can imagine how >>> distracting a >>> monitor showing the pictures as they are being taken as a real >>> impediment to >>> developing any kind of flow in the session. >> >> I didn't make a recording of the session, WR. Several folks stepped >> up to have their portraits done. The wireless interaction was very >> useful, and it also allowed immediate display of the capture on a >> large projection screen so the rest of the session participants could >> see what was going on. >> >> There's no point to discussing it further. You had to be there, I >> guess. But I now know another technique for a particular kind of work >> that I'm interested to become more involved with. > > I was interested in discussing it further, as I to do find it to be an > intriguing idea, but I bow to your obviously more vast knowledge on > the > subject, though I am saddened that on a photographic discussion > forum, this > sort of subject is not a worthy subject.
Sheesh. I don't know what more can be said, WR. Sorry I said it. "Discussion" doesn't seem to get there with this group, everyone just natters on with their opinion and a closed mind. I described the working methodology that was shown, explained how he used the wireless capture and how it affected his work and sometimes the subject interaction. No one has asked any questions about the demonstration or technique, just opined that they didn't think it would work. I give up. If this wireless SD card works and sends JPEGs incrementally live, as I work, I'll buy one and make you a demonstration video, ok? Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
