In a message dated 11/9/2007 1:05:06 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 2007/11/09 Fri AM 06:59:20 GMT > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: PESO - Water Temple II > > In a message dated 11/8/2007 1:21:25 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Excellent work on both images. The composition in the view from beneath is > great and the converging verticals on the second shot add impact - > definitely not one to try to fix the perspective! > > Structures from a time when infrastructure didn't just have to be purely > functional. >
Indeed. And, if you look at the location, there was no need to make it other than purely functional. http://www.flashearth.com/?lat=37.585432&lon=-121.885501&z=20&r=0&src=msl Well done for recording this (in an interesting way, too) before some philistine has it removed because it needs a little maintenance. ============== Interesting, Mike. That lets me see what was in those dirt mounds, nothing. It's been a very dry year. I think there is water there some years. But not sure. Although I have seen pictures of water on some site related to the Water Temple. I doubt they will, they spent a lot of money restoring it and a lot of time, three years. It seems to be a preprocessing plant, filtering water from various damns before it goes to SF. But I am not sure about that. Thanks for the aerial shot. Marnie aka Doe :-) --------------------------------------------- Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
