[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 11/9/2007 1:05:06 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Date: 2007/11/09 Fri AM 06:59:20 GMT >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: PESO - Water Temple II >> >>In a message dated 11/8/2007 1:21:25 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>Excellent work on both images. The composition in the view from beneath > > is > >>great and the converging verticals on the second shot add impact - >> definitely not one to try to fix the perspective! >> >> Structures from a time when infrastructure didn't just have to be purely > > > >>functional. >> > > > Indeed. And, if you look at the location, there was no need to make it > other than purely functional. > http://www.flashearth.com/?lat=37.585432&lon=-121.885501&z=20&r=0&src=msl > > Well done for recording this (in an interesting way, too) before some > philistine has it removed because it needs a little maintenance. > > ============== > Interesting, Mike. That lets me see what was in those dirt mounds, nothing. > It's been a very dry year. I think there is water there some years. But not > sure. Although I have seen pictures of water on some site related to the > Water > Temple. > > I doubt they will, they spent a lot of money restoring it and a lot of time, > three years. It seems to be a preprocessing plant, filtering water from > various damns before it goes to SF. But I am not sure about that. > > Thanks for the aerial shot. >
My pleasure. I do that quite a lot when people give specific locations. It helps me get a better perspective on some shots. Just for interest, here is the roof of the conservatory where I am writing this. Although it's dark, now. http://www.flashearth.com/?lat=54.89249&lon=-1.546691&z=20&r=0&src=ggl -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
