Bill, I am not sure about Canadian laws. At some point I looked into the issues of a "universal" model release form, and found that laws vary widely, even between different states in the US.
I vaguely remember that just recently, a decision of some court (probably in the US) that it was ok to display as a part of an art exhibition a photo of a person in a public place without a model release, but it had to be proven that it was art. I am not sure if something similar applies in your case. You may want to consider checking with the Regina Shutterbugs camera club, and see what their position on this is, and whether they had any releases or agreements signed by the model. If they have one, it may (or may not) help you, depending on the document. ann sanfedele wrote: > Especially since she was naked. IMHO, whether she was naked or not may charge it emotionally, but should not matter in the legalese. Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
