Bob Blakely wrote: >Now, as to her desires not to have the photographers display THEIR work and >share their pride in the development of THEIR art, she can ask all she >wants, even make "demands". Nevertheles, legal ears should be deaf to such >demands. William Robb is entirely within his rights and has done NOTHING >wrong.
All true, but this is really a tempest in a teapot. She would be very unlikely to take this to court because any competent lawyer will tell her: 1 - She doesn't have a leg to stand on legally (though a lawyer will just say she "doesn't have a strong case") 2 - She would *not* enjoy the cross-examination nor the way she would be portrayed in court by the defendant's attorney (yes, it's ugly, but when you take the low road you should be prepared to have the other party follow suit) 3 - Regardless of how the case works out, suing clients is a pretty good way to not have clients any more I think it's very nice of Bill to voluntarily remove the photos from his site -- there's enough confrontation in this world. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
