I don't think she was identified by name.
Sandy Harris wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2007 9:10 AM, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Professional Photographers Rule #1: Do not publish, in any form, nude photos
>> unless you have a long Form (SMP) Model Release specifically allowing you to
>> do so.
>>
>> It does not matter whether you are morally, legally, and ethically entitled
>> to;
>> you are still into a world of woe if you do. ...
>>
>> Sure you will probably win the case, but the cost in time and money is not
>> worth it.
>>
>
> Also, if she's objecting to having her nude photos on the net, where anyone
> can
> copy them and a potential employer or a boyfriend or whoever might find them
> by Googling her name, then she has a point. I'd say you should respect her
> wishes on this.
>
> There have been legal cases around "re-purposing" of data. Should National
> Geographic give photographers more money when it use their photos on CD
> as well as in print? What about newspaper writers whose work is later used
> on the paper's web site -- I think it was New York Times who went to court
> over that one? That sort of question is the main issue in the current strike
> by Hollywood and TV writers.
>
>
--
The difference between individual intelligence and group intelligence is the
difference between Harvard University and the Harvard University football team.
-- P. J. O'Roarke
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
