JPEG's mostly, but a couple RAW's (I've deleted them though). You sure there's no NR on RAW? I know Sony at least does NR on RAW's, and Canon does some on-chip NR that affects both formats.
The E-3 did not impress me at all. Poor handling and IQ appeared equal to the last-generation 10MP bodies based on the shots I've seen. -Adam On 12/8/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are u looking at JPEGs? No NR on RAW. > > G > ___ > Sent with SnapperMail > www.snappermail.com > > ...... Original Message ....... > On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:17:09 -0500 "Adam Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Based on what I've seen, the E-3 is much closer to the D200 than the > >D300 at 3200, and certainly inferior to the 40D (Poor resolution of > >detail due to excessive NR). > > > >-Adam > > > >On 12/7/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >>>> Who has a 14 megapixel APS CMOS sensor? > >> >>>> > >> >>> It's probably the Pentax-designed sensor we've been hearing about > >> >>> for a > >> >>> few years, with manufacturing done by some large semiconductor > >> >>> maker. > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> Gee whiz. Doesn't Samsung have the capability to do that sort of > >> >> thing? > >> > >> Panasonic manufactures the NMOS 4/3 System sensor that the Olympus > >> E-3 is using. From what I've seen, that chip has pretty darn nice ISO > >> 3200 noise characteristics ... better than the Canon 40D, and very > >> close to "on-par" with the Nikon D300 (the latest new technology > >> 16x24 sensor DSLR). Given Olympus' spec for active chip area, that's > >> 10.1 Mpixel spread over 13x17.3 mm chip area, or ~44,900 pixels/ > >> square mm. > >> > >> A 16x24 mm sensor having 14 Mpixel with the same technology would > >> have lower density and presumably even better noise characteristics, > >> at ~36,450 pixels per square mm. The K10D's older technology sensor > >> has about 26300 pixels per square mm by comparison. > >> > >> Godfrey > >> > >> (BTW: my friend's Nikon D300 arrived yesterday. I had the chance to > >> fool with it at lunch today. It was fitted with the Nikon 17-55/2.8 > >> VR lens. A very nice camera to work with.) > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > >> > > > > > >-- > >M. Adam Maas > >http://www.mawz.ca > >Explorations of the City Around Us. > > > >-- > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >[email protected] > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > >follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
