Walt,

IMHO, if you will only scan print, there no need to get any fancy scanner.

All of the good quality brand should do nicely.   I have an Epson 1650
that I paid USD$40, and it scan a print as good as a Microtek that was $300.

-Pasvorn

Walter Hamler on 12/13/2007 8:05 AM:
> I currently have a Canon Canoscan that I have had in service through 3
> different computers and three different OS. It works from inside PSE
> and does what I want, but now I am looking at doing a favor for
> someone, scanning some old family pics that may need some TLC as far
> as post processing and scanner capability.
> Question : Will I really see a big enough quality increase from a new
> scanner compared to this 5 or 6 year old Canon? And if so, what are
> some recommendayions?  I don't really want one that does slides/negs
> as well, as I have a good film scanner. I also would not really want a
> high end version if a 150.00 one will do just as good.
>
> Walt
>
>   

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to