I agree. I have an Epson 2450 that does scans of prints nicely. I would think your Canon should still do the trick.
Actually. i have to dig mine out. My old employer has asked if i can do a few articles for the newsletter. Dave On Dec 13, 2007 12:00 PM, Pasvorn Boonmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Walt, > > IMHO, if you will only scan print, there no need to get any fancy scanner. > > All of the good quality brand should do nicely. I have an Epson 1650 > that I paid USD$40, and it scan a print as good as a Microtek that was $300. > > -Pasvorn > > Walter Hamler on 12/13/2007 8:05 AM: > > > I currently have a Canon Canoscan that I have had in service through 3 > > different computers and three different OS. It works from inside PSE > > and does what I want, but now I am looking at doing a favor for > > someone, scanning some old family pics that may need some TLC as far > > as post processing and scanner capability. > > Question : Will I really see a big enough quality increase from a new > > scanner compared to this 5 or 6 year old Canon? And if so, what are > > some recommendayions? I don't really want one that does slides/negs > > as well, as I have a good film scanner. I also would not really want a > > high end version if a 150.00 one will do just as good. > > > > Walt > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
