Well, there was no one in my neighborhood who had a Raleigh, too expensive. I 
was the first kid with an "English Racer". That was because my grandfather 
bought it for me. He wanted me to have a real bike, like he had in the old 
country, and it had to be black too. Within a year every kid in the 
neighborhood 
had an "English Racer" but they were all bright colors and came from Sears or 
Wards. I remember that they were not as well built as my Dunelt.

There were two reasons you did not see full chain guards on bicycles in the US. 
The first was import taxes. American bikes were heavy and to keep imported 
bicycles from competing with them there was a much higher tax on bike that 
weighed more than 35 lbs. The second was that bicycles here were considered 
kids 
toys and doing away with the full chain case made them both cheaper and more 
sporty looking. As I recall the only bicycle that had them were the very top of 
the line Raleighs. That tax thing was another reason that the heavy Roadster 
type bicycles were not imported. Most of them that wound up were brought back 
by 
GI's who had picked them up while stationed in England. The so called English 
Racer was actually a "Sports" or "Light" Roadster. It was a city bike, while 
the 
Roadster was a country bike intended to deal with much rougher roads and tracks.

I have kind of come full circle on bicycles, from that Dunelt 3-speed, through 
an aluminum Raleigh racing bicycle, to a hybrid commuter and now I have another 
Black Dunelt (about 20 years newer than the one I had as a kid and nowhere near 
as well made) that I have to find an original 32 spoke front wheel for. I would 
like to have a full Roadster too; something about a long tall bike.

Graywolf
Website: http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Blog:    http://www.graywolfphoto.com/journal/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

P. J. Alling wrote:
> My first adult bike was a Raleigh three speed roadster, even that bike 
> only had a half chain guard.   After about 6 years I wanted something 
> fast and worked in a factory over a summer and bought a Supercourse Mark 
> II, (10 speed), put an aluminum rack on the back that I could hang 
> canvas panniers off if I needed to carry anything.  I think I'd still 
> have that bike if it hadn't been run over by a car. 
> 
> graywolf wrote:
>> Hey, that bike has been made exactly like that since 1903, kids! Oops! 
>> Sorry, 
>> they did upgrade it in the 70's when they started putting bright stickers on 
>> it. 
>> There are about 20 companies in India building those bikes, most of them get 
>> shipped to Africa. However you can get basically the same bike build in 
>> Holland 
>> with high-tech parts for $1500 or so.
>>
>> A little less tongue in cheek, the old roadster bicycle has its place when 
>> you 
>> need a bicycle for transportation instead of for a toy. They ain't fast, but 
>> they don't break, even when you hang a few hundred pounds of cargo on them.
>>
>> Graywolf
>> Website: http://www.graywolfphoto.com
>> Blog:    http://www.graywolfphoto.com/journal/
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> P. J. Alling wrote:
>>   
>>> Actually I was alluding to the point that bikes with full chain guards 
>>> were at least WWII vintage and therefore ancient...
>>>
>>> David Savage wrote:
>>>     
>>>> I interpreted Peter's comments as meaning that bikes with chain 
>>>> guards are for juvenile delinquents & sissies.
>>>>
>>>> But that's just me :-P
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> At 01:11 PM 19/12/2007, graywolf wrote:
>>>>   
>>>>       
>>>>> So, Peter, just what is your point? That you have been deprived? If 
>>>>> that is so,
>>>>> I can understand your resentment.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> P. J. Alling wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>         
>>>>>> I haven't had a bike with a chain guard since I was 12, and I never had
>>>>>> one with a full chain guard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> graywolf wrote:
>>>>>>       
>>>>>>           
>>>>>>> Ah, heck, Scott, the wheels are even already laced. This is the 
>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>             
>>>>> way they are
>>>>>     
>>>>>         
>>>>>>> supposed to come (second picture):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.yellowjersey.org/EASTMAN.HTML
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>> Scott Loveless wrote:
>>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>> http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/RaleighRapide02
>>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>   
>>>>       
>>>     
>>   
> 
> 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to