It was cross processed. They processed it as though it were transparency film. Paul On Jan 5, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
> Hi all, > > I just had a roll of Fuji Superia 400 developed (by a Kodak lab, as > far as > I know), and it looks odd, to say the least. The film is very dark > with a > blue hue, as opposed to the normal orange base color. The lettering > on the > side is white-ish, instead of black. I had the impression the > images are > in positive, and scanning conforms this. I put a scan up at > <http:\\www.jenny.dds.nl\lucas\494-01.jpg> > This is scanned with Vuescan on a Minolta Scan Dual III. Scanned as a > slide, so the image is as-is, not inverted. > > The film is fresh (expires 4-2008), stored dry and cool, from a > batch that > has not given me problems before. It has not been in the camera for > long > (a couple of days at most). Other films from the same camera (shot > both > right before and after) are fine. > > Does anybody here have any idea what has happened? > > Thanks in advance for any answer, > -- > Regards, Lucas > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
