Op Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:36:17 +0100 schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Scan them and have some fun playing with the in PhotoShop. Printing them
O.k. > would be a waste of time and money. But cross-processed images can yield > some interesting results, although it works better the other way around: > transparency film processed in C-41 chemistry. I feel so avant-garde! However, as they are mainly christmas snapshots, I wasn't exactly looking for 'interesting results'. -- Regards, Lucas > Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "Lucas Rijnders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Op Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:28:58 +0100 schreef Paul Stenquist >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Cross processed, in a big lab? How did they manage that? >> >> Other question: are these negatives printeable, of is heavy >> photoshopping >> the only way to salvage them? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Regards, Lucas >> >> > It was cross processed. They processed it as though it were >> > transparency film. >> > Paul >> > On Jan 5, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Lucas Rijnders wrote: >> > >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I just had a roll of Fuji Superia 400 developed (by a Kodak lab, as >> >> far as >> >> I know), and it looks odd, to say the least. The film is very dark >> >> with a >> >> blue hue, as opposed to the normal orange base color. The lettering >> >> on the >> >> side is white-ish, instead of black. I had the impression the >> >> images are >> >> in positive, and scanning conforms this. I put a scan up at >> >> <http:\\www.jenny.dds.nl\lucas\494-01.jpg> >> >> This is scanned with Vuescan on a Minolta Scan Dual III. Scanned as a >> >> slide, so the image is as-is, not inverted. >> >> >> >> The film is fresh (expires 4-2008), stored dry and cool, from a >> >> batch that >> >> has not given me problems before. It has not been in the camera for >> >> long >> >> (a couple of days at most). Other films from the same camera (shot >> >> both >> >> right before and after) are fine. >> >> >> >> Does anybody here have any idea what has happened? >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance for any answer, >> >> -- >> >> Regards, Lucas >> >> >> >> -- >> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >> >> and follow the directions. >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Ciao, Lucas >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow >> the directions. > > -- Ciao, Lucas -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
