Adam, Didn't say dirty isn't wasteful, just it's cheaper...less energy, heating, etc. Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 28, 2008 8:49 PM, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/28/08, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Frank, > > I'm a science/math kind of guy. > > I believe in something called the 2nd law of thermodynamics and entropy. > > It says clean will never easier/cheaper/faster/less costly, though it > > may be better. > > No brag, just fact. > > Regards, Bob S. > > > > Actually, dirty's quite wasteful. Recovering those expensive chemicals > rather than emitting them can easily pay for itself over time. Initial > costs are high, but when the chemicals are expensive, recovery and > recycling is well worth it. Emitting is cheap and easy, but poor > engineering. > > -Adam > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
