I've owned both in non-SMC form. I found I liked the Super Takumar 55/1.8's rendering a bit better, so I kept it and sold the 50/1.4 and 55/2.
-Adam On 2/20/08, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looking for an opinion or twenty. My Super-Tak 55/2 finally went down > for the dirt nap. There's a fungus among us. And the little ring that > has distance markings on it is spinning independently of the focus ring. > I'm considering Brian Ayling's repair method. > > Would anyone care to offer up opinions about the Super Takumar 50/1.4 > vs. the SMC Takumar 55/1.8? Thanks a bunch. > > -- > Scott Loveless > http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
