> > Sorry, back focusing. Well I'm glad to hear the. I though you might be engaging in something that was anatomically painful with a big lens...
David J Brooks wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:37 PM, frank theriault > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:31 PM, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Resent the K10D back to Maria at Pentax camera. >> > >> > Still bfing badly at f3.5 to 1.8. Its a pain to do macro with it this >> > way. This is why i was >> > not happy with results with my pentax but good ones with the d200 >> > >> > I have let them know it was not repaired correctly. Maybe someone will >> > actually look at it now. >> >> bfing? >> > > Sorry, back focusing. It looks fine in the finder, but when i look at > them something else, behind what i want in focus, is in focus. I > refuse to spend this kind of money to bracket focusing points, when i > know its fixable, as seen by a number of list members emails. > > I have a bad time with electronic repairs. Never seem to get it right > the first time. > > Dave > >> cheers, >> frank >> >> ps: it sucks that they didn't do it right the first time... >> >> -f >> >> -- >> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> >> > > > > -- Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
