You're welcome. Ironically, some testers have failed to notice the improved high ISO performance. But none of them have said what value they set for High ISO NR in the setup menus. I have it on "Weak." I suspect if it's turned off, the 3200 noise would be fairly pronounced, but I have no inclination to experiment. Paul On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:33 PM, Ken Waller wrote: > The apparent improved high ISO performance (thanks Paul) really > sold me, > otherwise I'm pretty sure I could have resisted. > > Kenneth Waller > http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Cory Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Is the K20D Popular? > > >> I think most of us agreed that the K20 is an improvement over the K10 >> (right?) >> I'm curious about the sales. I have not found the new camera >> compelling >> me to forsake the K10 in nearly the same way that I needed the K10 to >> replace the *istD. I know some of you have made the switch, but I >> get >> the feeling that the K10 had more buzz. My totally unfounded gut >> feeling is that the K10's initial buzz lasted longer and was more >> widespread than that of the K20. I wonder if the sales bear that >> out. >> What do you guys think? >> >> CW > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
