> But none of them have said what value they set for High ISO NR in the > setup menus. I have it on "Weak."
Other than write speed, what's the trade off for using higher levels of NR? I tend to leave most in camera/image controls off & use my CS2 for image modifications. I have no additional NR capabilities (other than those in CS2) Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Is the K20D Popular? > You're welcome. Ironically, some testers have failed to notice the > improved high ISO performance. But none of them have said what value > they set for High ISO NR in the setup menus. I have it on "Weak." I > suspect if it's turned off, the 3200 noise would be fairly > pronounced, but I have no inclination to experiment. > Paul > On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:33 PM, Ken Waller wrote: >> The apparent improved high ISO performance (thanks Paul) really >> sold me, >> otherwise I'm pretty sure I could have resisted. >> >> Kenneth Waller >> http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Cory Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Is the K20D Popular? >> >> >>> I think most of us agreed that the K20 is an improvement over the K10 >>> (right?) >>> I'm curious about the sales. I have not found the new camera >>> compelling >>> me to forsake the K10 in nearly the same way that I needed the K10 to >>> replace the *istD. I know some of you have made the switch, but I >>> get >>> the feeling that the K10 had more buzz. My totally unfounded gut >>> feeling is that the K10's initial buzz lasted longer and was more >>> widespread than that of the K20. I wonder if the sales bear that >>> out. >>> What do you guys think? >>> >>> CW -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
