Me too, except that I picked up Lightroom for nothing. Or to be accurate, I got a free license since I already was a RSP user. That's what I call a good deal :-)
I haven't tested 2.0 yet. I better get my new puter up running properly first. MaritimTim 2008/4/5, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 10:24:53AM +0100, Bob W wrote: > > > > > > Adobe, unfortunately, is pretty good at the time > > > expiration thing. Better > > > > than most. > > > > > > It's even better at the "Price ------> acute > > > indigestion/heart attack" sort of thing. > > > > > > > Lightroom is much cheaper than Photoshop, and far better in my opinion > > for photographers. I never really got on with Photoshop, and I haven't > > used it at all since I bought Lightroom, but I've used Lightroom a > > lot. I think it's probably the best-designed application, in any > > domain, that I've ever used, and worth the money. > > > > Bob > > I agree (especially since I picked up Lightroom at the introductory price). > About the only thing I couldn't do without using an external editor was > selective editing to just part of an image, and LR 2.0 apparently has that. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
