Yes, in many areas, the customer is put in charge of QC. If it isn't noticed, the manufacturers saves on their QC budgets. It does, however, place the supplier in the position of buffer, therein making it important to deal with a reputable supplier such as B&H.
Jack Jack --- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jack Davis" > Subject: Re: DA* 16-58/2.8 and the flat focus problem > > > > Is the current lens focus fracas something that's just being > noticed > > with the advent of the ability to discern and correct/adjust or is > it > > something new? > > Makes me a bit uneasy and suspicious of all my lenses. > > Did B&H press for the "controlled conditions" applied in testing > your > > 16~50 prior to agreeing to replace it? > > Personally, I think quality control among all the manufacturers has > gone to hell in a > handbasket. It's the price we pay for demanding that they put > products on the market as quickly > and as cheaply as they can. > > William Robb > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. > ____________________________________________________________________________________ You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
