Since that's the opposite results others have reported I begin to doubt the veracity of any review.
Look this is a situation , high contrast, that I would have expected to cause sensor bloom, and lots of it. <http://www.mindspring.com/~distilfink/PESO%20--%20treeline.html> Made with the *ist-Ds and F 70-210mm. I examined it closely and found almost none. I think that reviewers are shooting images intended to produce it intentionally and don't stop until it appears. They can then say "Ah-ha there it is." Colin J wrote: > I was considering buying a K20D because the low noise 14.6 MP sensor is > particularly attractive. However, the review in this week's "Amateur > Photographer" was a little disappointing, particularly when referring to > purple fringing. > > The review pointed out that a recent optical test of the 16-50mm f/2.8 DA > lens showed no problem of chromatic aberration, so the reviewer concluded > that the colour fringing must have come from the sensor. > > Any comments? Why should I buy a DSLR with a colour fringing problem? > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > Yahoo! For Good helps you make a difference > > http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/ > > -- Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
