My thought is that the gallery has enough in it now to allow the judges to be pickier. By that I mean, if they feel a particular photo has others in the gallery already then it might get rejected. If it is something totally different of new, then it might get accepted. As an example: There are some great dragonfly shots in the gallery now and I continue to see many more great dragonfly shots submitted. I could envision the judges to be more picky about that kind of shot than some other types that are not well represented.
-- Best regards, Bruce Saturday, June 7, 2008, 4:54:06 PM, you wrote: >>Maybe the bar isn't raised that high as >> before (I stopped trying for a long time). KW> I don't think so based on the stuff I see posted for voting..... KW> Kenneth Waller KW> http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f KW> ----- Original Message ----- KW> From: "Toine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KW> Subject: Re: pentax gallery >> Thanks. My main reason for posting this "news" is that I see lots of >> new photos in pentax gallery. Maybe the bar isn't raised that high as >> before (I stopped trying for a long time). >> Toine >> >> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Christine Aguila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> Big congrats, Toine! Cheers, Christine >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Toine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 11:29 AM >>> Subject: pentax gallery >>> >>> >>>>I have submitted a few photos in the last weeks. To my surprise some >>>> are accepted and if I watch the recent additions they accept loads of >>>> new photos. And more surprising many from non pentax glass. It does >>>> take several weeks before submitted changes to declined or accepted. >>>> >>>> >>>> Toine -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
