In a message dated 12/2/01 8:49:51 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

> basicly "Well what would you do without your fancy gear? You'd be lost
> because you aren't a real photographer..." At least that's how it seemed to
> me, and apearently I'm not the only one...
> 
> Isaac
> 
You're wrong. I never said or hinted at what you infer here. I did not, or 
have not inferred such. I ~did~ insist we talk about manual flash instead of 
the "what ifs" put forth to fend off answering my question regarding "manual 
flash."

Too many times, and your response here adds to the observation, someone 
gratuitously chimes into something that does not involve them. As my remarks 
were not addressed to you, you might have simply observed where the 
conversation was headed. 
Again, just because I'm opinionated, does not, at the same time, mean I can't 
be corrected. Had you yourself wanted to add to the "manual flash" tangent 
the thread had taken, instead of attempting to upbraid me, we might have 
moved on to something else. But you insisted...
    
And I'll say it again: knowing manual flash photography can get you out of 
trouble when your TTL or automatic flashes fail. That is what you needed to 
dispute. Moreover, there are times when TTL or "automatic" flash will not 
produce the desired results where manual flash will. 
Over dependence on TTL or "automatic" flash has meant lousy results for too 
many. Not being able to shoot manual flash means that too many times, 
otherwise competent photographers have to pass up shots, especially in early 
morning and late evening.   

Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to