Well, I *might* take the 50-135 on the subway (as Dave wrote that Frank does). I don't have a 645, but I would not carry a D300 w/ 2.8 glass mounted. SO has that set-up and I walk tipsy after carrying it. =)
Love my DS + 28. On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wouldn't call the K200D/50-135 exactly conspicuous. At least not > compared to a 645 with a 150 prime (Holy Mirror Slap, Batman) or even > my D300 with f2.8 glass mounted. But it's definitely more conspicuous > than a DS with a 28/2.8 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
