Let me re-phrase that. Dave wrote that Frank takes pics on the subway. Not that Frank uses a 50-135 on the subway.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:58 AM, gldnbearz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I *might* take the 50-135 on the subway (as Dave wrote that > Frank does). I don't have a 645, but I would not carry a D300 w/ 2.8 > glass mounted. SO has that set-up and I walk tipsy after carrying it. > =) > > Love my DS + 28. > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I wouldn't call the K200D/50-135 exactly conspicuous. At least not >> compared to a 645 with a 150 prime (Holy Mirror Slap, Batman) or even >> my D300 with f2.8 glass mounted. But it's definitely more conspicuous >> than a DS with a 28/2.8 > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
