Toralf Lund wrote: > P. J. Alling wrote: > >> Some sensors handle the boost much better than others, >> > Yes, but wouldn't that be because there is less noise to begin with? I.e > they have better performance at *all* ISOs? > Well yes, obviously. >> and the choices >> in processing made by the manufacturer, (as well as hardware), can >> affect the output in pleasant or unpleasant ways. >> >> > Indeed. But one of the questions I was asking was really, is the output > on the poorer performers just a result of bad processing choices that > might be fixed on the outside? > > - Toralf > Cameras from different manufacturers,, or different models from the same manufacturer, that use the same sensor can be compared for noise characteristics, as well as other imaging characteristics as well. The K10D and the Samsung GX10 which are very closely related and use the same sensor reportedly handle certain aspects of the sensor output very differently. > >
-- Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
