anyone found that the ambient shooting temperture affects high ISO performance? That would be interesting to know, here in florida its always HOT and I dont use it much, on the istDS ISO3200 is really bad and can only be used if you reduce the photo way down in size to like a thumbnail or something before the noise isnt very noticable.
JC OCONNELL [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 8:21 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Why to buy a K20D? To get serious about this, the ISO number doesn't just multiply the signal. There are other factors, most notably heat, that determine how much noise will acompany that multiplication. Thus, a camera can, indeed, be a good high ISO performer. And the K20D is exactly that. But as I noted before, correct exposure is critical. Push the result one stop, and the amount of noise will be multiplied far more. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I don't know why it works from a technical point of view, but it > works:-). The K20D yields very good high ISO pics with noise control > set to the minimum. If I get the results I want, I don't worry a lot > about why I got them. > Paul > Paul > On Jun 29, 2008, at 4:57 PM, Toralf Lund wrote: > > > Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> In truth, the K20D is an excellent high ISO performer, [ ... ] > > I've been meaning to ask some questions about this for a long time, > > since it doesn't really make sense to me when people say that a > > certain > > camera is has a good high ISO performance. I mean, doesn't the ISO > > setting just multiply the signal? Shouldn't that mean that the > > performance is exactly as good, relatively speaking, at high ISO > > values > > as it is at low ones (and vice versa)? Or is what people really mean > > that the noise under low-light conditions is better controlled > > (regardless of the ISO setting as such)? Or does the sensor actually > > have an improved dynamic range that doesn't show up at lower ISOs > > because the A/D cuts of part of the signal? Is this what "extended > > dynamic range" is all about? Or, alternatively, is everyone merely > > talking about the quality of the built-in image enhancement > > software (in > > which case I'm not really interested..)? > > > > Just thought I might mention it, since the subject was brought up > > yet again... > > > > - Toralf > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > > and follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
