On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:36 AM, AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since you mentioned the placidness on the list... :-) > > Well just kidding, but there's a huge grayzone between generally > agreed-upon facts and opinion-based articles. Just think of the > ever-lasting re-interpretation of history...
So this is just another way of politly saying Nikon and Canon then.:-) Dave > > I too appreciate Wikipedia for a primer on most subjects. 80-90% is great, > imho. > > Jostein > Who will not stray into global warming this time... :-) > > 2008/7/18 Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Anthony Farr wrote: >> >>> * Being the lazybones I am, my fact-checking is often done through >>> Wikipedia, in spite of that source's low standing in the eyes of >>> intellectual snobs. 80% to 90% reliability is good enough for me >>> considering the speed and ease of access that Wikipedia affords. >> >> My experience has been that Wikipedia is reasonably accurate for those >> things that are factual and verifiable. For those things that are >> opinion-based or judgement-based, forget it. :-) >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> DougF (KG4LMZ) >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > > > -- > http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ > http://alunfoto.blogspot.com > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
