Then I don't understand your sentence below. Dave is looking at
individual channels in RGB which, as you say, will be softer than the
full three channel composite.
At this point in the process, Bayer demosaicing and gamma
interpolation happened long ago ...
So what does "The Bayer demosaicing will then be trying to interpolate
from what information it has" have to do with the fact stated above?
G
On Sep 27, 2008, at 5:45 PM, Derby Chang wrote:
Yes, that's my point. If you are looking at a predominantly green
image, the detail is in the green. Looking at the red channel means
you are looking at rather less resolution than the full RGB image
D
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
When you're looking at an RGB channel file in Photoshop, the Bayer
demosaicing is long past.
Godfrey
On Sep 27, 2008, at 4:37 PM, Derby Chang wrote:
Don't forget, Dave, individual channels will be "softer" than the
full RGB image, especially if you are looking in one channel and
the most of the colours are in the other two. The Bayer
demosaicing will then be trying to interpolate from what
information it has.
D
David J Brooks wrote:
Good, its not my eyes.:-)
I tried adjusting sharpness on that channel but did not see any
change. I;'m sure i;m doing something wrong, or, the photos from
the
D200 ARE really soft.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
