Are you following all this Dave? ;-)
2008/9/28 Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Then I don't understand your sentence below. Dave is looking at individual > channels in RGB which, as you say, will be softer than the full three > channel composite. > > At this point in the process, Bayer demosaicing and gamma interpolation > happened long ago ... > > So what does "The Bayer demosaicing will then be trying to interpolate from > what information it has" have to do with the fact stated above? > > G > > > > On Sep 27, 2008, at 5:45 PM, Derby Chang wrote: > >> >> Yes, that's my point. If you are looking at a predominantly green image, >> the detail is in the green. Looking at the red channel means you are looking >> at rather less resolution than the full RGB image >> >> D >> >> >> >> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >>> >>> When you're looking at an RGB channel file in Photoshop, the Bayer >>> demosaicing is long past. >>> >>> Godfrey >>> >>> On Sep 27, 2008, at 4:37 PM, Derby Chang wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Don't forget, Dave, individual channels will be "softer" than the full >>>> RGB image, especially if you are looking in one channel and the most of the >>>> colours are in the other two. The Bayer demosaicing will then be trying to >>>> interpolate from what information it has. >>>> >>>> D >>>> >>>> >>>> David J Brooks wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Good, its not my eyes.:-) >>>>> >>>>> I tried adjusting sharpness on that channel but did not see any >>>>> change. I;'m sure i;m doing something wrong, or, the photos from the >>>>> D200 ARE really soft. >>>>> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
