On Sep 28, 2008, at 2:01 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Its funny, the K10D and D200 are3 both in the 10 mp range, albet some
differences in sensers and processing, but i need very little to PP a
K10D file than i do with a D200.
If sharpness is your primary criteria, remember that the K10D has a
weaker antialiasing filter than the D200 which means a bit more detail
snap to the images, straight out of the camera, with a slight
propensity to increased moiré artifacts in some circumstances.
So far, most things are pointing to an upgrade of some sort, to
satisfy my need for sharp images with minimal PP. Or, i just use the
D200 for NON action.
I don't know what you consider "minimal PP".
All of my exposures are captured in RAW format and processed in
Lightroom, from all my cameras. I apply my own develop preset on
import and do a little frame by frame tweaking, but I only rarely
spend more than, say, two or three minutes in image processing on a
given image. Once in a while I need to do something more drastic/
radical, or I try several different renderings with different ideas in
mind for a given exposure, but it's a rarity.
I can typically take 200-300 exposures, import, sort, grade and pick
10-20 out of that, produce finish prints and web renderings in about
half an hour to an hour (if I have a deadline to push me... ). That's
fairly minimal to me. :-)
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
