So, at the end of the day, after all the arguing over semantics is
done.... ;-) Is the damn thing worth the £160 it sells for in the UK? I
mean should I ask my wife to get me one for Christmas or look out an
older manual focus version?
Cheers,
Drew.
Jos from Holland wrote:
What about depency of eyesight quality?
People with reduced eyesight will always "enjoy" deeper depth of field? :-)
Maybe we just have to accept that there is only one subject to lens
distance sharp and we are lucky we can choose that point ourselfs (or
leave it to the camera)
Greetz, Jos
Joseph McAllister wrote:
Hey dudes, JC is correct on DoF. Chill.
Mixing CoC and DoF is a no win argument unless a value of CoC is fixed
before you start. You can achieve a deeper DoF from any projected
image if you decide after the fact that a sloppier focus (larger CoC)
is acceptable in your resultant print or negative, but that is not
changing the DoF, only your eyesight.
On Nov 14, 2008, at 05:32 , JC OConnell wrote:
B.S. in capitols. DOF is format and print size independent.
JC O'Connell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joseph McAllister
Pentaxian
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
