Why? I understand MF and LF ( I still shoot 4x5 and 8x10 once in a while) but why 35mm, what advantage is there to it? The asthetic "look of it" or for some other reason?
JC O'Connell [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Maas Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 1:21 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Its almost 2009 - Who's still shooting 35mm film? 35 and MF here. Shot a half-dozen rolls in the last month, I've been on a film kick of late. Mostly HP5+ and Tri-X in my FM2n, but some 400VC and Superia 800 as well through other bodies (Contax 137MD, FE2 and F2a) -Adam On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 1:00 PM, JC OConnell <[email protected]> wrote: > Its almost 2009 - Who's still shooting 35mm film? > > I have only shot one roll since going with a DSLR > a couple years ago. I am wondering, anyone on this > list still using 35mm film at all, or still using > 35mm film full time? > > JC O'Connell > [email protected] > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
