William, I had some custom-made prints once or twice - one got even
better as the group was really wide and the trimmed photo allowed me to
cut out the ceiling. But that was way before the computers got personal.
LF
William Robb escreveu:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: Resisting the Temptation of Wide-Angle (was -
PanasonicG1...example photo @ ISO 1000)
William Robb wrote:
I find for myself, that if I am doing a paid shoot, I, of course,
grab whichever lens is required, and often that is a very wide angle
When doing a paid shoot, going a little wider than what you *expect*
to need is usually better: You have to have room to crop off the ends
when a customer wants an 8 x 10 or 11 x 14 print -- and if your frame
everything tightly into the 2:3 ratio of most SLR's you won't be able
to supply prints in these "squarer" print formats without losing
things on the long ends of the frame.
When I worked at the photo store we had a number of "professional"
photographers who couldn't seem to grasp this concept.
We had a photographer have a brain fart on a group shot last year
where he filled the frame with his group, not allowing for 4:5 ratio
prints.
The post production person on the job was going mental until I
introduced her to the concept of using the transform tool as a way of
fitting the sides in. I figured they wouldn't mind being a bit thinner
anyway.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
Luiz Felipe
luiz.felipe at techmit.com.br
http://techmit.com.br/luizfelipe/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
