They're a little bit longer than the range you mentioned, but I really like my M135s.
I started out with the 3.5 http://flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157606933007213/ and liked shooting with it so much I got a 2.5: http://flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/collections/72157612665849907/ Those aren't the only lenses I was shooting with each of those nights. At the other end of the short tele scale is my FA77, but that's not an inexpensive lens: 135/3.5: http://flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/2794369036/in/set-72157606933007213/ 135/2.5: http://flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/3205338605/sizes/l/in/set-72157612707149030/ I ought to sell my 135. I think I paid between $60 and $80 plus shipping. It is, however, a bit smaller than the 2.5, so I'm not trying too hard to sell it. I'm currently bidding on an M100/2.8 in Oz. It's up to AU $100, and I probably ought to save my money for the DFA 100/2.8 macro. -- It's not the steps in the dance, it's the dance in the steps. Larry Colen [email protected] http://www.red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
