On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:24 AM, John Graves <[email protected]> wrote: > > > William Robb wrote: >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dario Bonazza" >> Subject: Re: The Ghost Appears! >> >> >>> Hmmm... I've just been informed that the 60-250 is delayed (again!) to >>> second half 2009. >> >> They probably think that if they hold off on it long enough they can jack >> the price to an even more unreasonable level. >> Note to Pentax: >> The Sigma 70-200/2.8 is starting to look like a contender, and they not >> only want less for it, they are actually making it available to Pentax >> users. > > I have been very happy with my Sigma 70-300/4-5.6 APO. My flying bird was > shot with it. If the same quality is there in the 70-200/2.8, I'd be > tempted, except I have the 70-300. > > John Graves > WA1JG > [email protected] >
The 70-200/2.8 is significantly better than their 70-300 APO. Of course it's also far larger, heavier and more expensive. -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
