But the SMC-M 20/4 also significantly less wide than the new 15mm, it's hardly an alternative. And I' take the 21 Limited instead, which slightly larger than the 20/4 and almost a stop faster.
-Adam On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Bob Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: > So why not buy an old M-20mm f4 lens. > It is more compact than the new 15mm f4. > Regards, Bob S. > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Charles Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Feb 10, 2009, at 20:58, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >>> >>> I tend to use ultrawide lenses stopped down anyway ... I usually used the >>> DA14 at f/5-f/8. So if this lens is good at f/4, it will be delightful. >>> >>> G >>> >> >> .. especially since you don't need to use it on a specifically-Pentax >> camera, right? >> >> I'd love to have this lens. I'll wager it costs almost as much as the 16-50 >> zoom though, which will put it out of the "reasonable" range for me. >> >> If they could sell it for $250 or less, I'd be RIGHT THERE. I'll wager it >> goes for $500-600 easily, though. :-( >> >> -Charles >> >> -- >> Charles Robinson - [email protected] >> Minneapolis, MN >> http://charles.robinsontwins.org >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
